Devuan 对比 Debian 项目研究
Architectural Divergence and Strategic Viability: An Exhaustive Analysis of Devuan GNU+Linux Relative to the Debian Project
架构分歧与战略可行性：Devuan GNU+Linux 相对于 Debian 项目的详尽分析
1. Executive Summary
1. 执行摘要
The evolution of the Linux ecosystem in the last decade has been fundamentally shaped by the centralization of system management responsibilities under the systemd init system. While this shift has facilitated standardization across major commercial distributions, it precipitated a significant ideological and technical schism within the community, culminating in the creation of Devuan GNU+Linux. This report provides a comprehensive, expert-level analysis of Devuan’s architectural proposition, operational governance, and performance characteristics as they stand in the 2024-2025 timeframe. The central thesis of this research posits that Devuan serves a critical, albeit niche, role as a "preservationist innovator"—a platform that preserves traditional UNIX modularity through the mechanism of "Init Freedom" while innovating the infrastructure necessary to decouple modern user-space applications from monolithic dependencies.1
过去十年 Linux 生态系统的演变在根本上受到了系统管理职责向 systemd 初始化系统集中的重塑。虽然这一转变为主要商业发行版的标准化提供了便利，但它也在社区内部引发了重大的意识形态和技术分歧，最终导致了 Devuan GNU+Linux 的诞生。本报告对 2024-2025 年期间 Devuan 的架构主张、运营治理和性能特征进行了全面、专家级的分析。本研究的核心论点在于，Devuan 作为一个“保护性的创新者”发挥着关键（尽管是利基市场）的作用——作为一个平台，它通过“初始化自由”（Init Freedom）机制保留了传统的 UNIX 模块化，同时创新了必要的基础设施，以将现代用户空间应用程序与单体依赖解耦 1。
The analysis reveals that Devuan acts as a stabilizing force for legacy hardware and embedded systems where the resource overhead of systemd is prohibitive. By maintaining binary compatibility with Debian while stripping the default init system, Devuan offers a distinct value proposition for administrators requiring deterministic boot processes and reduced attack surfaces.3 However, the project faces substantial long-term risks associated with the maintenance burden of forked components such as eudev and elogind, particularly as upstream Debian development becomes increasingly entangled with systemd interfaces.5 The report concludes that while Devuan’s governance under the Dyne.org foundation is financially stable and transparent, its future viability depends on the sustained collective effort of the independent "Init Freedom" community to maintain the compatibility shims that bridge the gap between modern Linux software and traditional init systems.7
分析显示，对于 systemd 资源开销过大的传统硬件和嵌入式系统而言，Devuan 起到了稳定力量的作用。通过在保持与 Debian 二进制兼容的同时剥离默认初始化系统，Devuan 为需要确定性启动过程和减少攻击面的管理员提供了独特的价值主张 3。然而，该项目面临着与维护 eudev 和 elogind 等分叉组件相关的重大长期风险，特别是随着上游 Debian 开发日益与 systemd 接口纠缠在一起 5。报告的结论是，尽管 Devuan 在 Dyne.org 基金会下的治理在财务上是稳定且透明的，但其未来的生存能力取决于独立的“初始化自由”社区的持续集体努力，以维护弥合现代 Linux 软件与传统初始化系统之间差距的兼容性垫片 7。
2. Historical Context and Ideological Foundations
2. 历史背景与意识形态基础
2.1 The Systemd Schism and the "Veteran Unix Admins"
2.1 Systemd 分裂与“资深 Unix 管理员”
The genesis of Devuan cannot be understood without dissecting the technical and cultural upheaval caused by the adoption of systemd in Debian. In 2014, the Debian Technical Committee voted to adopt systemd as the default initialization system for Debian 8 "Jessie." This decision was driven by a desire to modernize the Linux boot process, enabling parallel service startup, unifying logging via journald, and managing hardware events more tightly.9 However, a vocal segment of the community, identifying as "Veteran Unix Admins" (VUA), viewed this as a violation of the core UNIX philosophy: "Do one thing and do it well." They argued that systemd’s architecture—which subsumes logging, network management, device management, and login handling into a single project—created a "monoculture" and a single point of failure.2
如果不剖析 Debian 采用 systemd 所引发的技术和文化动荡，就无法理解 Devuan 的起源。2014 年，Debian 技术委员会投票决定采用 systemd 作为 Debian 8 "Jessie" 的默认初始化系统。这一决定的推动力来自于对 Linux 启动过程现代化的渴望，即实现并行服务启动、通过 journald 统一日志记录以及更紧密地管理硬件事件 9。然而，社区中一部分自称为“资深 Unix 管理员”（VUA）的人士对此持强烈反对意见，他们认为这违反了核心的 UNIX 哲学：“做一件事并把它做好。”他们认为，systemd 的架构——将日志记录、网络管理、设备管理和登录处理纳入单个项目——创造了一种“单一文化”和一个单点故障 2。
Devuan was officially announced in late 2014 as a fork of Debian with a singular, overriding mandate: "Init Freedom." Unlike other distributions that might offer alternatives, Devuan’s existential purpose is to decouple the operating system from systemd, ensuring that the init system remains a swappable component rather than a monolithic platform layer.1 This divergence was not merely technical but governance-related; the founders argued that Debian had been "taken over" by the agenda of the GNOME project and Red Hat developers, necessitating a fork to preserve the freedom of choice for system administrators.2
Devuan 于 2014 年末正式宣布成立，作为 Debian 的一个分支，其首要且压倒性的任务是实现“初始化自由”。与其他可能提供替代方案的发行版不同，Devuan 存在的目的是将操作系统与 systemd 解耦，确保初始化系统仍然是一个可交换的组件，而不是一个单体平台层 1。这种分歧不仅是技术上的，也是治理相关的；创始人认为 Debian 已经被 GNOME 项目和 Red Hat 开发者的议程“接管”，因此必须进行分叉以保留系统管理员的选择自由 2。
2.2 The Strategic Importance of "Init Freedom"
2.2 “初始化自由”的战略重要性
"Init Freedom" serves as the guiding principle for all architectural decisions within Devuan. It is defined as the ability to run a functional operating system without mandatory dependency on a specific init system. While Debian technically allows the installation of other inits, the increasing number of packages (such as desktop environments like GNOME) that have hard dependencies on systemd interfaces (like logind) makes running a non-systemd Debian system progressively more difficult and functionally limited.12
“初始化自由”是 Devuan 内部所有架构决策的指导原则。它被定义为运行一个功能完备的操作系统而无需强制依赖特定初始化系统的能力。虽然 Debian 在技术上允许安装其他初始化系统，但越来越多的软件包（如 GNOME 等桌面环境）对 systemd 接口（如 logind）存在硬依赖，这使得运行非 systemd 的 Debian 系统变得越来越困难且功能受限 12。
Devuan addresses this by maintaining a modified package repository where dependencies on systemd are either removed or satisfied by alternative implementations (shims). This strategy allows Devuan to support a diverse range of initialization systems—SysVinit, OpenRC, and Runit—as first-class citizens, ensuring that the choice of PID 1 does not dictate the rest of the user-space software stack.14
Devuan 通过维护一个修改后的软件包仓库来解决这个问题，在这个仓库中，对 systemd 的依赖要么被移除，要么由替代实现（垫片）来满足。这一策略使得 Devuan 能够支持多种初始化系统——SysVinit、OpenRC 和 Runit——作为一等公民，确保 PID 1 的选择不会支配其余的用户空间软件栈 14。
3. Governance, Funding, and Operational Structure
3. 治理、资金与运营结构
3.1 The Role of the Dyne.org Foundation
3.1 Dyne.org 基金会的角色
A critical differentiator between Devuan and many community forks is its legal and fiscal backing by the Dyne.org Foundation. Based in Amsterdam, Dyne.org is a non-profit entity with a history of supporting free software projects focused on digital sovereignty and independent media. Since the project's inception, Dyne.org has provided the legal umbrella for Devuan, holding assets, managing donations, and ensuring regulatory compliance under Dutch law.1
Devuan 与许多社区分支的一个关键区别在于它得到了 Dyne.org 基金会 的法律和财政支持。Dyne.org 总部位于阿姆斯特丹，是一个非营利实体，长期支持专注于数字主权和独立媒体的自由软件项目。自项目成立以来，Dyne.org 为 Devuan 提供了法律保护伞，持有资产、管理捐赠并确保符合荷兰法律的监管要求 1。
This governance structure provides stability that purely volunteer-driven projects often lack. It ensures that the project can own infrastructure (servers, domains) and accept tax-deductible donations without relying on the personal bank accounts of developers. This structural maturity is evidenced by the regular publication of financial transparency reports.7
这种治理结构提供了纯志愿者驱动项目通常缺乏的稳定性。它确保项目可以拥有基础设施（服务器、域名）并接受可免税的捐赠，而不依赖于开发者的个人银行账户。这种结构上的成熟度体现在定期发布的财务透明度报告中 7。
3.2 Financial Analysis and Resource Management
3.2 财务分析与资源管理
An analysis of Devuan’s financial reports from 2020 through 2025 reveals a project that operates on a lean, sustainable model. The foundation enforces a strict policy where the yearly turnover of funds retained for operational costs is capped at approximately 10%, ensuring the vast majority of resources are directed toward infrastructure and development capabilities rather than administrative overhead.7
对 2020 年至 2025 年 Devuan 财务报告的分析显示，该项目以精益、可持续的模式运作。基金会执行严格的政策，将保留用于运营成本的年度资金周转率上限设定为约 10%，确保绝大多数资源用于基础设施和开发能力，而非行政开销 7。
Key Financial Metrics (2024-2025):
关键财务指标（2024-2025）：
The financial data suggests that Devuan is not attempting to compete with commercial entities like Red Hat or Canonical. Instead, it operates as a community utility, funded sufficiently to keep the lights on and the mirrors running, but structured to prevent the emergence of financial hierarchies among developers.15
财务数据表明，Devuan 并不试图与 Red Hat 或 Canonical 等商业实体竞争。相反，它作为一个社区公用设施运作，资金足以维持基本运营和镜像运行，但其结构旨在防止开发者之间出现财务等级 15。
4. Technical Architecture: The Mechanics of De-coupling
4. 技术架构：解耦的机制
Devuan's technical achievement lies in its ability to offer a system that behaves like Debian in terms of package management (apt, dpkg) and stability, while radically altering the initialization and service management layer. This is achieved through a sophisticated infrastructure that intercepts, modifies, and rebuilds Debian packages.
Devuan 的技术成就于它能够提供一个在包管理（apt、dpkg）和稳定性方面表现得像 Debian 的系统，同时从根本上改变了初始化和服务管理层。这是通过一个能够拦截、修改和重建 Debian 软件包的复杂基础设施来实现的。
4.1 Amprolla: The Merge Infrastructure
4.1 Amprolla：合并基础设施
At the heart of Devuan's build system is Amprolla (a portmanteau of "umbrella" and "amp"), a specialized tool designed to merge upstream Debian repositories with Devuan-specific overlays. Devuan does not fork every single package in Debian; doing so would be an insurmountable task for a small team. Instead, Amprolla automates the filtering process.17
Devuan 构建系统的核心是 Amprolla（"umbrella" 和 "amp" 的合成词），这是一个专门设计的工具，用于将上游 Debian 仓库与 Devuan 特有的覆盖层合并。Devuan 并不分叉 Debian 中的每一个软件包；对于一个小团队来说，这样做是一项不可逾越的任务。相反，Amprolla 自动化了过滤过程 17。
Amprolla works by synchronizing with Debian's package lists and then applying a blacklist/whitelist mechanism. Packages that contain hard dependencies on systemd are either blocked or replaced by modified versions from the Devuan overlay repository. This system allows Devuan to track Debian's release cycles (Stable, Testing, Unstable) closely. When a security update is pushed to Debian, Amprolla pulls it, checks it against the overlay policies, and pushes it to the Devuan mirrors, usually within a very short time window.17 This architecture ensures that Devuan users receive the same security patches as Debian users, maintaining the "Debian Stable" promise of reliability.
Amprolla 的工作原理是与 Debian 的软件包列表同步，然后应用黑名单/白名单机制。包含对 systemd 硬依赖的软件包要么被阻止，要么被 Devuan 覆盖仓库中的修改版本替换。该系统允许 Devuan 紧密跟踪 Debian 的发布周期（稳定版、测试版、不稳定版）。当安全更新推送到 Debian 时，Amprolla 会拉取它，根据覆盖策略进行检查，并通常在非常短的时间窗口内将其推送到 Devuan 镜像 17。这种架构确保 Devuan 用户收到与 Debian 用户相同的安全补丁，保持了“Debian 稳定版”的可靠性承诺。
4.2 The Shim Architecture: libsystemd0, eudev, and elogind
4.2 垫片架构：libsystemd0、eudev 和 elogind
To maintain compatibility with the vast Debian ecosystem without running systemd as PID 1, Devuan employs a series of architectural "shims"—components that mimic systemd's interfaces to satisfy software dependencies.
为了在不运行 systemd 作为 PID 1 的情况下保持与庞大 Debian 生态系统的兼容性，Devuan 采用了一系列架构“垫片”——这些组件模仿 systemd 的接口以满足软件依赖。
libsystemd0 Compatibility: Many standard Linux binaries are compiled against libsystemd to utilize functions like socket activation or journal logging. If Devuan simply removed this library, thousands of packages would fail to install due to missing shared objects. Devuan provides a version of libsystemd0 that exists on the filesystem to satisfy the dynamic linker but is essentially functionally stripped or redirected. This allows binaries to "believe" they are running on a systemd system, preventing installation failures.13
libsystemd0 兼容性： 许多标准的 Linux 二进制文件都是针对 libsystemd 编译的，以利用套接字激活或日志记录等功能。如果 Devuan 简单地移除这个库，成千上万的软件包将因缺少共享对象而无法安装。Devuan 提供了一个文件系统上存在的 libsystemd0 版本，以满足动态链接器的需求，但在功能上本质上是被剥离或重定向的。这使得二进制文件“相信”它们运行在 systemd 系统上，从而防止安装失败 13。
elogind for Session Management: Desktop Environments (GNOME, KDE, Xfce) rely on systemd-logind to manage user sessions, handle power events (suspend/resume), and manage permissions for hardware access (seats). Devuan utilizes elogind, which is the logind code extracted from the systemd source tree and patched to run as a standalone daemon without the systemd init process. elogind exposes the standardized D-Bus interface org.freedesktop.login1, allowing desktop environments to function correctly without realizing systemd is absent.10
用于会话管理的 elogind： 桌面环境（GNOME、KDE、Xfce）依赖 systemd-logind 来管理用户会话、处理电源事件（挂起/恢复）并管理硬件访问权限（席位）。Devuan 利用 elogind，这是从 systemd 源代码树中提取并打补丁的 logind 代码，它作为一个独立的守护进程运行，无需 systemd 初始化进程。elogind 暴露了标准化的 D-Bus 接口 org.freedesktop.login1，允许桌面环境在未察觉 systemd 缺席的情况下正常运行 10。
eudev for Device Management: In the systemd world, udev (the device manager) is tightly integrated into the systemd source repository. Devuan uses eudev, a fork originally created by the Gentoo project to decouple udev from systemd. This ensures that Devuan systems can populate /dev and handle hot-plug events (USB insertion, network cable detection) independently. Following Gentoo's decision to drop eudev in 2021, maintenance was picked up by an independent group of contributors from Alpine, Devuan, and other non-systemd distros, highlighting the collaborative nature of the "Init Freedom" ecosystem.5
用于设备管理的 eudev： 在 systemd 世界中，udev（设备管理器）被紧密集成到 systemd 源代码仓库中。Devuan 使用 eudev，这是最初由 Gentoo 项目创建的一个分支，旨在将 udev 与 systemd 解耦。这确保了 Devuan 系统可以独立填充 /dev 并处理热插拔事件（USB 插入、网线检测）。继 Gentoo 在 2021 年决定放弃 eudev 后，维护工作由来自 Alpine、Devuan 和其他非 systemd 发行版的独立贡献者小组接手，突显了“初始化自由”生态系统的协作性质 5。
5. Detailed Analysis of Initialization Systems
5. 初始化系统的详细分析
Devuan’s "Init Freedom" is not a marketing slogan but a technical reality manifested in its support for three distinct initialization systems. Each offers a different balance of complexity, speed, and philosophy.
Devuan 的“初始化自由”不仅仅是一个营销口号，而是体现在其对三种不同初始化系统支持上的技术现实。每一种系统都在复杂性、速度和理念之间提供了不同的平衡。
5.1 SysVinit: The Traditionalist Standard
5.1 SysVinit：传统主义标准
SysVinit remains the default init system in Devuan 6 "Excalibur," maintaining the workflow that was standard in Linux for two decades.
在 Devuan 6 "Excalibur" 中，SysVinit 仍然是默认的初始化系统，保持了 Linux 二十年来的标准工作流程。
Architecture: It operates on the concept of "runlevels" (0-6), representing different system states (halt, single-user, multi-user, reboot). Service management is handled via shell scripts stored in /etc/init.d/, which are symlinked to directories like /etc/rc2.d/ to determine startup order.9
架构： 它基于“运行级别”（0-6）的概念运行，代表不同的系统状态（停机、单用户、多用户、重启）。服务管理通过存储在 /etc/init.d/ 中的 Shell 脚本处理，这些脚本被软链接到如 /etc/rc2.d/ 等目录以确定启动顺序 9。
Pros: Deterministic (services start one by one), easy to debug (scripts are readable text), and extremely stable.
优点： 确定性（服务逐个启动），易于调试（脚本是可读文本），且极其稳定。
Cons: Lacks parallel startup capabilities, leading to slower boot times on modern multicore hardware compared to systemd. Lacks inherent process supervision (if a daemon dies, SysVinit generally won't restart it automatically).23
缺点： 缺乏并行启动能力，导致在现代多核硬件上的启动时间相比 systemd 较慢。缺乏内在的进程监管（如果守护进程死亡，SysVinit 通常不会自动重启它） 23。
5.2 OpenRC: The Modernized Dependency Manager
5.2 OpenRC：现代化的依赖管理器
OpenRC is available as a popular alternative in Devuan, often viewed as the "modern" choice for those who dislike systemd. It works slightly differently in Devuan compared to its native implementation in Gentoo.
OpenRC 作为 Devuan 中流行的替代方案，通常被视为那些不喜欢 systemd 的用户的“现代”选择。与 Gentoo 中的原生实现相比，它在 Devuan 中的工作方式略有不同。
Architecture: In Devuan, OpenRC often runs on top of the SysVinit PID 1 process, acting as a service manager that handles dependency resolution. It reads the same /etc/init.d/ scripts but uses its own dependency logic to start services in parallel where possible.25
架构： 在 Devuan 中，OpenRC 通常运行在 SysVinit PID 1 进程之上，充当处理依赖关系解析的服务管理器。它读取相同的 /etc/init.d/ 脚本，但使用其自己的依赖逻辑，在可能的情况下并行启动服务 25。
Configuration: It uses /etc/conf.d/ for configuration variables, separating code from config.
配置： 它使用 /etc/conf.d/ 存放配置变量，将代码与配置分离。
Pros: Offers parallel boot (faster than pure SysVinit), cleaner syntax, and robust dependency management without the monolithic scope of systemd.
优点： 提供并行启动（比纯 SysVinit 快），更清晰的语法，以及强大的依赖管理，且没有 systemd 的单体范围。
Native vs. Wrapper: While typically used as a manager over SysVinit in Devuan, it can technically be configured to run as PID 1 (openrc-init), though the default Devuan installation typically wraps it for maximum compatibility with Debian packaging scripts.27
原生对比包装器： 虽然在 Devuan 中通常作为 SysVinit 之上的管理器使用，但在技术上它可以配置为作为 PID 1 运行（openrc-init），尽管默认的 Devuan 安装通常将其包装以实现与 Debian 打包脚本的最大兼容性 27。
5.3 Runit: The Performance Specialist
5.3 Runit：性能专家
Runit is the choice for users prioritizing minimalism, speed, and embedded applications.
Runit 是优先考虑极简主义、速度和嵌入式应用程序的用户的选择。
Architecture: Runit uses a service directory structure, typically /etc/sv/ (available services) and /var/service/ (running services). Enabling a service is as simple as creating a symlink from the former to the latter. Runit acts as a process supervisor: if a service crashes, Runit restarts it immediately.28
架构： Runit 使用服务目录结构，通常为 /etc/sv/（可用服务）和 /var/service/（运行服务）。启用服务只需创建一个从前者到后者的符号链接。Runit 充当进程监管者：如果服务崩溃，Runit 会立即重启它 28。
Comparison: Unlike SysVinit, Runit defines services in small run scripts rather than large complex shell scripts.
对比： 与 SysVinit 不同，Runit 在小型 run 脚本中定义服务，而不是大型复杂的 Shell 脚本。
Implementation in Devuan: Devuan integrates Runit carefully. While Runit can be PID 1, Devuan packages often maintain the SysVinit scripts for compatibility, meaning users sometimes have to create their own Runit service definitions if the package maintainer hasn't provided a specific /etc/sv entry. However, for base system services, support is robust.30
在 Devuan 中的实现： Devuan 谨慎地集成了 Runit。虽然 Runit 可以是 PID 1，但为了兼容性，Devuan 软件包通常保留 SysVinit 脚本，这意味着如果软件包维护者没有提供特定的 /etc/sv 条目，用户有时必须创建自己的 Runit 服务定义。然而，对于基本系统服务，支持是稳健的 30。
6. Performance Benchmarking and Use Cases
6. 性能基准测试与用例
Devuan’s refusal to use systemd is often validated by its performance characteristics in specific environments. While modern high-end servers may not show significant differences, constrained environments reveal sharp contrasts.
Devuan 拒绝使用 systemd 的做法通常通过其在特定环境中的性能特征得到验证。虽然现代高端服务器可能显示不出显著差异，但受限环境揭示了鲜明的对比。
6.1 Memory Footprint and Embedded Systems
6.1 内存占用与嵌入式系统
One of the strongest arguments for Devuan is its efficiency in low-resource scenarios. Systemd-based distributions have a higher baseline memory usage due to the required running daemons (systemd-journald, systemd-udevd, systemd-logind, systemd-resolved, etc.).
Devuan 最有力的论据之一是其在低资源场景下的效率。基于 Systemd 的发行版由于需要运行守护进程（systemd-journald、systemd-udevd、systemd-logind、systemd-resolved 等），其基准内存使用量较高。
Sub-1GB RAM Scenarios: Benchmarks and user reports indicate that on systems with 256MB to 512MB of RAM, Devuan (specifically using Runit or SysVinit) significantly outperforms Debian. On such hardware, the overhead of systemd can lead to "page thrashing" (excessive swapping), rendering the system unresponsive. Devuan’s lighter init process allows more RAM to be dedicated to actual application workloads.3
低于 1GB 内存的场景： 基准测试和用户报告表明，在具有 256MB 至 512MB 内存的系统上，Devuan（特别是使用 Runit 或 SysVinit）的性能显著优于 Debian。在这样的硬件上，systemd 的开销可能导致“页面抖动”（过度交换），致使系统无响应。Devuan 更轻量的初始化进程允许将更多 RAM 专用于实际的应用程序工作负载 3。
Embedded Comparison: In embedded Linux contexts where storage and memory are premium commodities, Runit’s negligible footprint allows Devuan to be deployed where standard Debian would be too heavy. This makes Devuan a viable alternative to Alpine Linux for users who prefer the apt ecosystem and glibc over Alpine’s apk and musl.34
嵌入式对比： 在存储和内存是稀缺商品的嵌入式 Linux 环境中，Runit 可忽略不计的占用空间使得 Devuan 可以部署在标准 Debian 过于沉重的地方。这使得 Devuan 成为那些相比 Alpine 的 apk 和 musl 更喜欢 apt 生态系统和 glibc 的用户的 Alpine Linux 可行替代方案 34。
6.2 Boot Time Analysis
6.2 启动时间分析
Boot time comparisons present a mixed picture that depends heavily on hardware configuration.
启动时间的比较呈现出一幅好坏参半的画面，这在很大程度上取决于硬件配置。
Parallel vs. Serial: Systemd excels at parallelization. On a modern multicore CPU with an NVMe SSD, systemd will generally boot faster than SysVinit because it aggressively starts services concurrently. SysVinit’s serial execution creates a bottleneck where the CPU waits for I/O operations to complete one by one.4
并行与串行： Systemd 擅长并行化。在配备 NVMe SSD 的现代多核 CPU 上，systemd 的启动速度通常比 SysVinit 快，因为它积极地并发启动服务。SysVinit 的串行执行造成了瓶颈，CPU 必须等待 I/O 操作逐个完成 4。
Optimization: However, OpenRC and Runit on Devuan can be configured for parallel startup, narrowing this gap. Furthermore, for server environments that reboot rarely, boot time is often considered a secondary metric compared to runtime stability and determinism.35
优化： 然而，Devuan 上的 OpenRC 和 Runit 可以配置为并行启动，从而缩小这一差距。此外，对于很少重启的服务器环境，与运行时稳定性和确定性相比，启动时间通常被视为次要指标 35。
Table 3: Theoretical Performance Matrix
表 3：理论性能矩阵
7. Release Strategy and Roadmap
7. 发布策略与路线图
Devuan adheres to a stable release cycle that mirrors Debian’s but operates with a slight delay to accommodate the package merging and sanitization process.
Devuan 坚持一个稳定的发布周期，该周期反映了 Debian 的发布周期，但会有轻微的延迟，以适应软件包合并和清理过程。
7.1 Current and Future Releases
7.1 当前与未来版本
Devuan 5 "Daedalus" (Oldstable): Released in August 2023, based on Debian 12 "Bookworm." This release solidified the support for alternative desktop environments without systemd dependencies.
Devuan 5 "Daedalus"（旧稳定版）： 基于 Debian 12 "Bookworm"，于 2023 年 8 月发布。该版本巩固了对无 systemd 依赖的替代桌面环境的支持。
Devuan 6 "Excalibur" (Stable): Released in November 2025, based on Debian 13 "Trixie." Key features include Kernel 6.12 LTS and the controversial adoption of the usrmerge (merged /usr) directory layout. While some in the community resisted usrmerge as another "Red Hat-ism," Devuan developers concluded that fighting the layout change—which is now hardcoded into the Debian build infrastructure—would require too many resources. This pragmatism ensures continued compatibility with upstream packages.36
Devuan 6 "Excalibur"（稳定版）： 基于 Debian 13 "Trixie"，于 2025 年 11 月发布。主要特性包括 Kernel 6.12 LTS 和备受争议的 usrmerge（合并 /usr）目录布局的采用。虽然社区中有人抵制 usrmerge，认为它是另一种“Red Hat 主义”，但 Devuan 开发人员得出的结论是，对抗这种布局变更——现在已硬编码到 Debian 构建基础设施中——将需要太多资源。这种实用主义确保了与上游软件包的持续兼容性 36。
Devuan 7 "Freia" (Testing): Currently in planning, based on Debian 14 "Forky." Early repositories are available, focusing on supporting new architectures like RISC-V and maintaining the eudev infrastructure.18
Devuan 7 "Freia"（测试版）： 目前处于规划阶段，基于 Debian 14 "Forky"。早期的仓库已经可用，重点是支持像 RISC-V 这样的新架构并维护 eudev 基础设施 18。
7.2 Long Term Support (LTS)
7.2 长期支持（LTS）
Devuan benefits directly from Debian’s LTS efforts. Once a Devuan release moves to "oldstable," it continues to receive security updates via the Amprolla merge of Debian’s LTS repositories. This guarantees a 5-year support lifecycle for each release, making Devuan suitable for enterprise deployments requiring long-term stability.39
Devuan 直接受益于 Debian 的 LTS 工作。一旦 Devuan 版本变为“旧稳定版”，它将继续通过 Debian LTS 仓库的 Amprolla 合并接收安全更新。这保证了每个版本 5 年的支持生命周期，使 Devuan 适合需要长期稳定性的企业部署.39
8. Strategic Risk Analysis
8. 战略风险分析
While Devuan has proven its viability over a decade, it faces significant structural risks.
尽管 Devuan 在过去的十年中证明了其可行性，但它面临着重大的结构性风险。
8.1 The Maintenance Burden of Independence
8.1 独立的维护负担
The primary risk is the maintenance of the fork. As Debian (and the broader Linux ecosystem) integrates systemd more deeply—into home directory management (systemd-homed), installer logic, and container management—the effort required to "unpick" these dependencies grows.
The decision by Gentoo to drop eudev was a critical moment. While independent maintenance has continued, the number of developers qualified to maintain a device manager kernel-space interface is small.5 If the independent eudev or elogind projects fail due to lack of contributors, Devuan would face a crisis, potentially forcing it to develop its own solutions from scratch or lose compatibility with modern hardware.
主要风险在于分支的维护。随着 Debian（以及更广泛的 Linux 生态系统）将 systemd 更深入地集成——进入主目录管理（systemd-homed）、安装程序逻辑和容器管理——“拆解”这些依赖所需的工作量也在增加。
Gentoo 决定放弃 eudev 是一个关键时刻。虽然独立维护仍在继续，但有资格维护设备管理器内核空间接口的开发人员数量很少 5。如果独立的 eudev 或 elogind 项目因缺乏贡献者而失败，Devuan 将面临危机，可能迫使其从头开始开发自己的解决方案，或失去与现代硬件的兼容性。
8.2 Niche vs. Obsolescence
8.2 利基市场与过时
Devuan occupies a niche: users who fundamentally disagree with systemd. This is a passionate but potentially shrinking demographic as new generations of administrators learn Linux entirely within the systemd paradigm. Devuan’s challenge is to prove it is not just a "legacy" system for old admins, but a technically superior option for specific use cases like containers (where a heavy init inside a container is undesirable) and minimal secure appliances.8
Devuan 占据了一个利基市场：根本上不同意 systemd 的用户。这是一个充满激情但可能正在萎缩的人群，因为新一代管理员完全在 systemd 范式内学习 Linux。Devuan 的挑战在于证明它不仅是老管理员的“遗留”系统，而且是针对特定用例（如容器，在容器内运行重型 init 是不可取的）和最小化安全设备的技术上优越的选项 8。
9. Conclusion
9. 结论
Devuan GNU+Linux stands as a resilient testament to the diversity of the open-source ecosystem. It has successfully transitioned from a reactionary fork into a stable, well-governed distribution that delivers on its promise of "Init Freedom." By leveraging a unique infrastructure of repository merging (amprolla) and compatibility shims (libsystemd0, elogind), it offers a robust Debian-compatible experience without the architectural monolithic design of systemd.
Devuan GNU+Linux 是开源生态系统多样性的一个坚韧证明。它已成功从一个反动的分支转变为一个稳定、治理良好的发行版，实现了其“初始化自由”的承诺。通过利用独特的仓库合并基础设施（amprolla）和兼容性垫片（libsystemd0、elogind），它在没有 systemd 架构单体设计的情况下，提供了强大的 Debian 兼容体验。
For the general desktop user, the differences may be philosophical. However, for embedded engineers, systems administrators dealing with legacy infrastructure, and minimalists seeking to reduce memory footprint and attack surface, Devuan provides indispensable value. Its future is secure financially through the Dyne.org foundation, but technically it remains in a constant race to maintain the bridges connecting the traditional UNIX world with the rapidly evolving, systemd-centric Linux landscape.
对于普通桌面用户来说，差异可能是哲学上的。然而，对于嵌入式工程师、处理遗留基础设施的系统管理员以及寻求减少内存占用和攻击面的极简主义者来说，Devuan 提供了不可或缺的价值。通过 Dyne.org 基金会，其未来在财务上是安全的，但在技术上，它仍然处于一场持续的竞赛中，以维护连接传统 UNIX 世界与快速发展、以 systemd 为中心的 Linux 格局的桥梁。
Works cited
Welcome to devuan.org | Devuan GNU+Linux Free Operating System, accessed November 20, 2025,
Announcement of the Debian Fork | Devuan GNU+Linux Free Operating System, accessed November 20, 2025,
Best low-memory Linux Server Distros for < 1GB deployments - LinuxBlog.io, accessed November 20, 2025,
What are your boot-time benchmarks? : r/linux - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
udev - Wikipedia, accessed November 20, 2025,
[gentoo-dev] last rites: sys-fs/eudev - Google Groups, accessed November 20, 2025,
Financial Report - Devuan, accessed November 20, 2025,
What is the future for Devuan? - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
A Survey of Init Systems - » Linux Magazine, accessed November 20, 2025,
systemd - Wikipedia, accessed November 20, 2025,
The 'Devuan' Debian fork - LWN.net, accessed November 20, 2025,
What exactly is systemd, sysvinit and runit? : r/linuxquestions - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
Is it possible to use Debian without systemd? - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
Init Freedom | Devuan GNU+Linux Free Operating System, accessed November 20, 2025,
Financial Report - Devuan, accessed November 20, 2025,
Financial Report - Devuan, accessed November 20, 2025,
Profiles / NvidiaGpus - Devuan Wiki, accessed November 20, 2025,
Devuan - Wikipedia, accessed November 20, 2025,
Setup security.devuan.org repo (#40) · Issues, accessed November 20, 2025,
Avoiding systemd isn't hard | Hacker News, accessed November 20, 2025,
Devuan ASCII 2.0.0 stable - LWN.net, accessed November 20, 2025,
CLI - Things and Stuff Wiki, accessed November 20, 2025,
SysVinit vs SystemD. Linux systems have a method of managing… | by natnat | Medium, accessed November 20, 2025,
Init vs Systemd | Cycle.io, accessed November 20, 2025,
Switching init systems in Devuan - Other Distributions - It's FOSS Community, accessed November 20, 2025,
OpenRC vs. SysV-init : r/Gentoo - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
[Solved] openrc-init failure / Hardware & System Configuration / Dev1 Galaxy Forum, accessed November 20, 2025,
runit-quickstart - GitHub Pages, accessed November 20, 2025,
Using the `runit` init system - Tutorials & Resources - It's FOSS Community, accessed November 20, 2025,
runit as a process supervisor / DIY / Dev1 Galaxy Forum, accessed November 20, 2025,
Help with devuan & runit : r/linuxquestions - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
Devuan is much faster on older hardware than debian(celeron n3050) / Devuan / Dev1 Galaxy Forum, accessed November 20, 2025,
The best init system / Installation / Dev1 Galaxy Forum, accessed November 20, 2025,
Alternative init systems : r/linux - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
How FAST is Linux to boot-up and shutdown ? : r/linuxquestions - Reddit, accessed November 20, 2025,
Systemd-Free Debian, Devuan Version 6.0 "Excalibur" is Available Now - It's FOSS, accessed November 20, 2025,
Release Information | Devuan GNU+Linux Free Operating System, accessed November 20, 2025,
SoylentNews is people, accessed November 20, 2025,
LTS - Debian Wiki, accessed November 20, 2025,
Devuan | endoflife.date, accessed November 20, 2025,
systemd, 10 years later: a historical and technical retrospective - OSnews, accessed November 20, 2025,